Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Today's ABC Open photos

A seat with a view.
By Steve Porter ·  · From Pic of the Week
After a week holidaying on Straddie, I finally managed to drag myself out of bed early enough to catch the sunrise. It was definitely worth it.  Published 06 Mar 2017.  Point Lookout QLD 4183




View from the other side
By Belinda Nugent ·  · From Pic of the Week
Once a poddy, always a poddy.    Published 02 Mar 2017.  Dubbo NSW 2830




What lies underneath
By oxalis_curator ·  · From Pic of the Week
Beneath the bark is a incredible rosy red.       Published 02 Mar 2017.      Risdon TAS 7017



Secret, maybe not so secret water fall near Lawson
By james_terry70 ·  · From Pic of the Week
Secret, maybe not so secret water fall near Lawson, Blue Mountains. Ill be back when its raining.Published 21 Jul 2016.  Lawson NSW 2783


Lake Argyle at Sunrise
By Landi Bradshaw ·  · From Pic of the Week


I live in Kununurra and quite often when I would visit Lake Argyle Resort and be swimming in the infinity pool to see people walking to the edge of the ridge opposite the pool. I knew I wanted to find this spot and found out how to get to the walk track. 
This particular morning myself, my partner and a couple of friends departed Kununurra at 3:30am to drive out to Lake Argyle. 
We commenced the one hour hike around 4:00am with dogs in tow and to make sure we got to the highest point just before sunrise. We made it just in time! And wow what a view it was. 
The ranges in our view were slowly changing colour as the sun came up, starting from a light pink and changing into a bright yellow. Such a beautiful spot and not even the hundreds of flies on our faces and backs could ruin this moment.    Published 14 Oct 2015.  Kununurra WA 6743



Morning fog
By honeycut ·  · From Pic of the Week

Perfect conditions driving over Donna Buang this morning. With low cloud obscuring Warburton below, the sun was radiating the mist through the majestic Mountain Ash above the cloud level. Could almost be two different photos joined together!           Published 07 Mar 2017.  Warburton VIC 3799

Saturday, April 8, 2017

Today's ABC Open photos

The National Arboretum in Canberra
By VIKASH ·  · From Pic of the Week
It did not look like a great morning when i woke up but i still decided to jog up the mountain and wait in anticipation of a great morning   Published 03 Mar 2017.  Molonglo Valley ACT 2611


Juvenile Pacific Gull
By Nikki Long ·  · From Pic of the Week
Juvenile Pacific Gull  Published 03 Mar 2017.  Bicheno TAS 7215




Some beautiful paths can't be discovered...
By hummingbyrd ·  · From Pic of the Week
Some beautiful paths can't be discovered without getting lost.    Published 03 Mar 2017.  Bendigo VIC 3550



Hitchhiking chooks
By holbrookpaddockeggs ·  · From Pic of the Week
Now that's what I call a ute load!             Published 12 Aug 2016.  Holbrook NSW 2644




Well hello there!
By timhackwood ·  · From Pic of the Week
A Mareeba Rock-wallaby joey (Petrogale mareeba) popping out to sniff the weirdo with a camera. The population around Granite Gorge are quite habituated to humans and not afraid to come in and investigate!     Published 01 Mar 2017.  Chewko QLD 4880




It's the simple things
By Julie Hill ·  · From Pic of the Week
Oblivious to the spectacular sky above him, Humphrey only has eyes for the oat treat I carry with me.       Published 06 Mar 2017.     Darlington Point NSW 2706

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Arthur Marshall Hoyle guilty of sex offences

University of Canberra lecturer guilty of raping, indecently assaulting students

Updated yesterday at 2:45pm
A former University of Canberra (UC) law lecturer has been found guilty of raping one student, and indecently assaulting others, under the pretence of plagiarism meetings.
Arthur Marshall Hoyle, 67, was found guilty by a Supreme Court jury of two counts of rape and six counts of indecent assault.
Hoyle was acquitted of two more charges, but was visibly distressed as the verdicts were delivered.
He held his head in his hands, slumped in his chair, and was also seen muttering to himself and shaking his head.
Justice Michael Elkaim told the court it was "difficult to imagine a more serious offence" besides murder.
Students came forward to claim Hoyle had arranged one on one meetings with them to discuss plagiarism concerns.
One student alleged Hoyle raped her, while another said he showed her pornographic images, including child pornography, during a Powerpoint presentation about the alleged academic misconduct.
In all, five women came forward with complaints about Hoyle, which included claims he inappropriately touched and tried to kiss them.

Hoyle 'took advantage' of students

Each of the meetings were set up after UC staff noticed an essay question from the curriculum posted to an essay purchasing site.
One student claimed Hoyle had shown her pornography, before touching her inappropriately, and said that when he raised the concerns about plagiarism he said "we can make this go away".
Hoyle maintained the porn sites appeared when the woman's assignment was tested for plagiarism, and he had shown her the presentation he was preparing to show his boss in making the case about students cheating.
Prosecutor Trent Hickey told the court Hoyle had exploited the students' concerns about failing and compromising their studies, as well as their vulnerability because of poor English language skills.
But Hoyle's lawyer, Liesl Chapman, argued the Crown's case was extremely unrealistic.
She said he had sound academic reasons to meet each of the women, to discuss plagiarism.
Hoyle's bail was revoked and a sentence hearing has been set for next month.

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Today's ABC Open photos

A deep patch
By nakita_eden ·  · From Pic of the Week

Found a bit of a deep patch in the creek yesterday, Chad got a couple of boots full of water.    Published 31 Jan 2017.  Karratha WA 6714



Superman Barn
Ah the good old Superman barn, sitting solitarily in the middle of the Breeza plains. Published 02 Mar 2017.  Breeza NSW 2381




Sassafras nuts
By apall93 ·  · From  Pic of the Week
Published 02 Mar 2017.  Wollongong NSW 2500











The wet is on its way
By Dee Hartin ·  · From Pic of the Week
Casino cloudscape    Published 02 Mar 2017.  Casino NSW 2470









I have the best hobby in the world - Eastern yellow robin
By catblack10 ·  · From Pic of the Week
 Eastern yellow robin   Published 01 Mar 2017.  Maroochydore QLD 4558







Love this photo of a mob coming up the road
By lovemerino ·  · From Pic of the Week
If you look really carefully you can see some Alpacas which live with our Merinos and help protect the lambs from nasty foxes!       Published 03 May 2016.  Wellington NSW 2820

Monday, April 3, 2017

Miranda Devine: Reverse racism is now acceptable in Australia

by Miranda Devine









Mother Tara Coverdale 

Like most mothers with young children,  Tara Coverdale enjoys opportunities to socialise with other mothers of children the same age while on maternity leave, especially in her neighbourhood in inner-city Sydney.
So when a Russian-born friend mentioned a playgroup on Thursdays, at the Alexandria Park Community Centre, she was enthusiastic.
Two weeks ago, on a humid Thursday morning, she bundled her eight-month-old baby in the pram and walked with her four-year-old son the short distance to the community centre.
When she arrived, her red-haired son raced off to play while she looked around for her friend.
That was when a staff member approached and asked if it was her first day. Coverdale thought how nice that she was so attentive.
"I'm sorry you can't come here.  It's a multicultural playgroup."
But then the woman said: “Can I ask what your cultural background is?”
Taken aback, Coverdale, who has blonde hair and freckles, said: “I’m Australian”.
Immediately, the woman said: “I’m sorry, you can’t come here. It’s for multicultural families and people who speak languages other than English at home.”
Coverdale stood her ground: “I said ‘I’m not leaving’. My kids were playing. My older son was having such a good time with his buddy, and I thought, ‘Why should I leave?’”
But then the centre “facilitator”, aka manager, Jo Fletcher, confronted her: “Can I just ask what your cultural background is.”
When Coverdale said she was fourth-generation Australian, Fletcher said: “I’m sorry you can’t come here. It’s a multicultural playgroup.”
This conversation is an account from Coverdale’s recollection. Fletcher did not respond to phone calls and a text message last week, but she confirmed to the NSW Department of Education, which funds the centre, that such a conversation had taken place.
Coverdale said she tried charm in a bid to be allowed to attend the playgroup, but Fletcher insisted it was exclusively for “multicultural” mothers who “might be lonely and might want to build a network of people who speak the same language”.
Coverdale asked wouldn’t it be better for those mothers to meet someone like her, who knows a lot of people in the community.
“What if I was really lonely and I get sent away from a play group?”
Then she asked what playgroup would she be allowed to join.
“We don’t have one here for you,” said Fletcher. “You’ll have to go up to Erskineville or Newtown.”
Erskineville’s playgroup is for “Rainbow babies and kids”, and Newtown is a 30-minute walk.
The only other playgroup offered at Alexandria Park is on Wednesdays but it is reserved for “Swedish-speaking families”, according to a timetable Fletcher provided.
“We’re in a pretty progressive area,” says Coverdale. “It’s very accepting of all people. But I feel like I’m excluded.”
And she asks: “How does that help Australia help people to integrate, speak English and build a life…
“I pay a lot of tax. I pay my rates. To think I’m actually not welcome is unfair.”
The other mums thought her treatment was “terrible… They think it’s a great facility and appreciate it but they don’t want to exclude people”.
While she was at the centre she saw other mothers walk in and, “they were made to feel very welcome. Because they didn’t look ‘Australian’ they didn’t even get asked about their background.”
So Coverdale and her red-haired sons were ejected from the playgroup.
Ironically enough, it was just a few days before Harmony Day, a big event at Alexandria Park, “to celebrate our country’s cultural diversity”, with a free halal beef and chicken sausage sizzle. To twist the knife a little deeper, this year’s theme was “We all belong”.
Just not if you are of “Anglo-Celtic” heritage.
Anti-Discrimination Board Acting President Elizabeth Wing confirmed on Friday that “on the face of it”, exclusion from a playgroup “on the basis of race or ethnic background... would appear to be a breach of the [anti-discrimination] act”.
After being alerted to the problem on Friday, Education Minister Rob Stokes and his department, to their credit, instructed Fletcher to allow all families to attend the playgroup.
“I was disappointed to hear that a mum and her young child felt they were not welcome... This is not acceptable. Everyone, regardless of their background, should feel included in these wonderful community activities.”
The Education Department also has “counselled the program facilitator [Fletcher] regarding the requirement of the program to be inclusive”, said a spokesman late Friday.
A good result, but Fletcher is a creature of her milieu. It is politically incorrect to say so, but anti-white racism is now acceptable in Australia, in the name of diversity and “celebrating difference”.
In the ADF, for instance, there are attempts to erase the “Anglo-Saxon” warrior culture, and a recent lamb advertisement stated there are “too many white people” on TV, and lined up caucasians sneeringly labelled “white-whites, translucent whites, beige whites, red whites, and dark whites”.
Bigotry is condoned as a corrective to so-called “white privilege”.
But reinforcing separate cultural identities inevitably leads to the balkanization of Australia and the disowning of our national identity.

Thankfully, Zed Seselja, Assistant Minister for Multicultural Affairs, last month reset national policy, with an approach which emphasises unity and shared values. It’s about time.

Sunday, April 2, 2017

Mark Latham's sacking more to do with free market than free speech

by Carolyn Ovington from The Weekend Australian
Associate Editor
Sydney











Mark Latham


Mark Latham was sacked from Sky News this week and plenty of people are cross about it, especially our readers. This I know because I took the time to go through the comments under the story that announced his departure from Sky (which, for the record, is now 100 per cent owned by News Corp, which also owns The Weekend Australian.)
People are saying he has been sil­enced. They’re angry about the way he has been denied his right to free speech.
OK, so before we get to whether Latham should or should not have been sacked, here’s some background. Latham was this year hired by Sky to host a program called Outsiders, alongside the editor of The Spectator Australia, Rowan Dean, and former MP Ross Cameron. These three made a big song and dance, right from the start, about how their show was going to be different from all the other panel shows on TV. They weren’t going to be all leftie PC. They were going to call it like they saw it, without fear or favour.
They were going to offend, and why not? There’s no law against it, and plenty of people are thirsting for a show that has some flame-throwers on it.
And so the show began, and Latham — once the leader of the opposition, who came really close to winning the Lodge — started attacking people. His first target was Sky colleague (and this paper’s contributing editor) Peter van Onselen, whom he called a man toddler. Next was van Onselen’s wife, Ainslie, for the work she did on diversity projects while at Westpac; then he went for another Sky colleague, former Labor premier of NSW Kristina Keneally, whom Latham described as a “protege of Eddie Obeid”.
Kristina Keneally

Wait … what? Obeid is a former Labor minister who is now in jail on corruption charges. So what was Latham actually saying when he described Keneally was Eddie’s “protege”?
He must have known he was sailing close to the trip wire that is defamation law in Australia with that one, and if not, well, he should have known, because Keneally promptly lodged a complaint with Sky management.
This was the moment for Latham to pause and reset. But Latham doesn’t seem to have a pause and reset button. He kept going.
His next target was the ABC’s Wendy Harmer. She had tweeted that she didn’t like Latham’s show, so he said: “Wendy, of course, we know her well. She’s a proven commercial failure, so naturally she got a job at ABC radio at the sheltered workshop there for all the lefties.
“She fits the criteria: she’s female, she’s got a disability — that’s what they mean by diversity.”
Now, I’m not a defamation lawyer, but surely even people who aren’t trained journalists can see what he’s done there. There’s a difference between expressing an opinion and saying something that isn’t true, and what Latham said wasn’t true. Harmer doesn’t have a disability, and even if she did, so what? That’s not why the ABC hired her. She’s also not a commercial failure. She’s a successful stand-up comedian, radio broadcaster, TV host and author. That’s why you know her name.
At this point, somebody should have realised that Latham was in trouble. The rules of defamation law are fairly simple. You can be offensive. You can be rude. You can be biased and revolting. But you can’t be wrong. (For the record, Harmer did not want him sacked; she wanted an apology.)
But it was already too late, since reporters had found, or been alerted to, yet another clip of Latham being offensive on Outsiders — and this time, the target was a schoolboy.
He picked on a schoolboy, saying he thought the kid, who had made a YouTube video for International Women’s Day, was gay.
OK, you wouldn’t put up with that on the school grounds, so why did Latham think he would get away with it on TV? Which of course he didn’t: as soon as Sky News chief executive Angelos Frangopoulus became aware of the comments, he sacked Latham.
And here is where it gets tricky. This is a free-speech newspaper, and if the comments on the story about Latham’s sacking are a guide, many of our readers don’t believe he should have been sacked. Here’s a sample: “I cannot tell you how appalled I am at this decision on Latham. It’s Orwell’s 1984 being played out for real.”
There have been reports of people cancelling their Foxtel subscriptions, such as reader Lyn, who wrote: “Rang Foxtel this morning, advised I was cancelling. The bloke at the end of the line was horrified that such a long-term customer would do such a thing.”
And this: “Pathetic from Sky News! What a disgrace. No such thing as free speech any more. Mark Latham was one of the best and most entertaining presenters. The thing we loved most was he was NOT politically correct.”
A Change.org petition has been launched to try to get the decision reversed. It says: “Mark Latham’s commentary on Sky News has been a breath of fresh air. He’s always called it as he’s seen it and many of us have appreciated his non-PC approach to current affairs. Far worse things have been said by the ABC’s Chaser boys over the years and the worst that they’ve ever copped has been a one-off two-week suspension of their show.”
The feeling is that Latham has been silenced for being politically incorrect. Now I don’t expect many people to agree with me, but I’m sorry, that’s just not so.
Latham was sacked because he picked on a schoolboy. To make the point more plainly: he’s an adult with a TV show, bullying a kid about his sexuality, or perhaps his manliness, because the kid spoke up for women on International Women’s Day.
It’s wrong for adults to try to humiliate kids. Do I really have to explain why? Should Sky have fired him for it? In my opinion, no, but I can see why it was thought he was just too loose a cannon to keep on contract.
Yet he still doesn’t seem to get it. In the days after he was sacked, his Twitter account, @RealMarkLatham, came back to life, and it is now full of complaints about how the PC warriors are winning the free speech war.
One of his followers asked him: “So where to now Mark? You have loyal followers who still want to see & hear you. Don’t give up please.” He Tweeted back: “Already fielding offers … to continue important work, free from those who cave in to pathetic PC outrage industry.”

But that isn’t what happened. Latham wasn’t sacked by Sky for speaking his mind. They let him go because they thought the risk of having somebody saying something defamatory was too high, and ultimately the costs of that outweighed the benefits. That’s not about free speech. That’s the free market.